HR Signal: The EU Whistleblowing Directive

Read more

Neurodiversity in the workplace: Can ADHD or autism be a reason for dismissal?

Neurodivergent individuals, such as those with ADHD or autism, can bring unique perspectives and valuable skills to the workplace. However, it is crucial to understand that legal protections for neurodivergent employees are not absolute. Employers have the right to take appropriate action against any employee, regardless of their neurodiversity. However, these actions must always be fair, lawful, and based on objective factors, not solely on an employee’s neurodiversity status. – Karolina Kanclerz and Zuzanna Janelli comment for Rzeczpospolita.

Full article in Polish avialible here.

HR Legal Update: Workplace bullying and discrimination: new bill published!

On 20 January 2025, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy published a bill amending workplace bullying and discrimination legislation. The bill introduces significant changes, including a revised definition of bullying, new employer obligations and updated liability rules. As a result, existing solutions aimed at preventing workplace bullying and discrimination need to be reviewed.

Key highlights of the bill:

1) Emphasis on persistence the new definition underlines persistence as an essential feature of bullying. This includes repetitive, recurrent or persistent behaviour, which can manifest in physical, verbal or non-verbal forms.

2) A non-exhaustive list of bullying behaviours includes:

  • humiliation or insult;
  • intimidation;
  • professional undermining;
  • unjustified criticism, demeaning remarks or ridicule;
  • obstruction of an employee’s ability to function effectively in the work environment, including achieving work results, performing business tasks, utilising competencies, communicating with colleagues, and accessing necessary information;
  • isolation or exclusion from the team.

The bill eliminates the existing requirement that all conditions must be met cumulatively to constitute bullying.

3) Enhanced preventive measures employers will have to establish clear rules, procedures and a schedule for actions preventing violations of employees’ dignity and other personal rights, as well as the regulations for ensuring equal treatment in employment, and addressing discrimination and bullying.

Such rules will have to be included in a collective agreement, work regulations or a formal company announcement.

4) Clearer definition of a bully – bullying can originate from various sources within and beyond the workplace, including employers, supervisors, colleagues in equivalent positions, subordinates, other employees and contractors.

5) Bullying assessment when assessing whether an employee has experienced bullying, both objective factors (impact on the employee) and subjective factors (employee’s feelings or reactions, provided they are deemed reasonable) will be taken into account.

Moreover, even if it is found that certain behaviour does not constitute bullying, the court will still assess whether the employee’s dignity or other personal rights have been violated.

6) Employer’s limited liability – employers may be exempt from liability for bullying if they demonstrate taking effective preventive measures to address workplace bullying and the bullying was not caused by a person who managed the employee or held a position of authority over them.

7) Introduction of minimum compensation – defined as the employee’s 6-month salary. This is in addition to any other damages that the employee may be entitled to claim.

8) Changes regarding discrimination – the bill also amends the anti-discrimination provisions, shifting the burden of proof. An employee will only need to plausibly allege a breach of the principle of equal treatment. The employer will then have to prove that no such violation occurred.

Contact us!

Download the PDF: here.

Fake illnesses. The growing issue of employees abusing sick leaves

The misuse of medical certificates for temporary work incapacity, usually referred to as sick leaves, has become an increasingly common problem. This is particularly evident with short-term leaves, and those taken close to weekends. Two factors significantly contribute to this trend: issuing sick leaves electronically (e-ZLA) and the widespread use of teleconsultations. Together these have made obtaining sick leaves easier than ever before. – Paweł Sych and Aleksandra Bruchajzer comment for magazine HR na Szpilkach.

Full article in Polish avialible here.

Blind lawsuits: a new legal measure to fight online hate speech. Will it paralyse the court system?

The new Polish “anti-hate law” introduces blind lawsuits, a novel legal mechanism that allows individuals to sue anonymous online perpetrators. To initiate such a lawsuit, a motion must be filed with the court compelling service providers, such as online forums or social media platforms, to disclose the identity of the author of the harmful post. The court is then obligated to issue an injunction to the provider within seven days. This measure may be a positive development in the fight against online hate speech. – Michał Włodarczyk comments for Newseria Biznes.

Read more: here.

Does Polish law guarantee the right to be offline?

The existing provisions of the Polish Labour Code regarding working hours may not adequately address the modern work reality. The legislator should consider introducing specific laws that would guarantee employees the right to be offline. Employers can, however, already take appropriate steps in this direction.  – Kinga Polewka-Włoch and Michalina Lewandowska-Alama comment for Rzeczpospolita.

Full article in Polish avialible: here.

What Risks Does an Employer Face if Their Driver Loses Their License?

The Minister for Digitalisation proposed a fully automated system that would allow employers to check the driving licences of their employees. Now, employers should screen their employees’ driving records in the Central Driver Register. This is crucial because employers cannot legally allow employees to work without the necessary qualifications, including a valid driving licence. – Bartosz Wszeborowski and Jan Kozakoszczak comment for Rzeczpospolita.

Link to the article: here. 

CJEU ruling: No revolution in Polish working time recording

Initial interpretations suggested that the recent CJEU ruling on working time recording would necessitate a significant shift in Polish practices. In Poland, this would primarily concern employees working under task-based systems, those managing on behalf of the employer, and those receiving overtime lump sums. The Labour Code currently exempts these categories of employees from detailed working time recording requirements. This led to speculation that the CJEU judgment would require full-time recording for these employees as well. However, a closer analysis reveals that the ruling does not fundamentally alter the existing legal framework and full-time recording for these categories of employees is not required. – Paweł Sych comments for Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

Full article here. 

Closing the gender pay gap: Ministry prepares new legislation

The Ministry of Family and Labour is currently developing a new law aimed at eliminating the gender pay gap. Thus, it is crucial to develop a robust methodology for calculating the pay gap, ensuring accurate and reliable data. This work cannot wait until 2026; immediate action is required to align the 2026 pay gap report with the requirements of the EU Directive. – Michał Włodarczyk comments for Business Insider Polska.

Full article in Polish avialible: here.

New definition of workplace bullying: A surge of lawsuits?

The proposed legislation on workplace bullying introduces significant changes, particularly concerning compensation and damages. Notably, it eliminates the previously mandated minimum compensation amount. Instead, employees subjected to bullying will be able to claim damages from their employers, with a minimum threshold of six months’ salary. However, I believe setting this minimum threshold is a mistake. Compensation for workplace bullying should accurately reflect the actual harm suffered by the employee. – Michał Włodarczyk comments for Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

Full article in Polish avialible: here.

Labour Code 2025

We would like to invite you to read our latest publication, “Labour Code 2025” produced jointly with Dziennik Gazeta Prawna.

Key topics covered in “Labour Code 2025”:

  • The new minimum wage and its impact on employee benefits.
  • Practical implementation of whistleblower protection.
  • Tools for safeguarding employer and employee interests under the Anti-hate Act.
  • Expanded powers of the State Labour Inspectorate (PIP) in reclassifying employment relationships by administrative decisions.
  • Key points of the Platform Directive – business benefits and implications.
  • Strategies for mitigating conflicts of interest in the workplace.
  • Regulations governing working time for remote and task-based employees.

Authors: Sławomir Paruch, Robert Stępień, Paweł Sych, Michał Bodziony, Kinga Ciosk.

The publication is available on the Dziennik Gazeta Prawna website.

Enter your username or email address. You will receive an email with link to reset your password.